Forms destroyed using Safari on a Mac

Martin68

Well-known member
Hello everyone,

I've had a problem with Dadabik on Safari for a while. Safari under OSX displays defective form masks, the individual fields overlap and are therefore not usable.

Does anyone know this problem and can confirm it. Or even better, does anyone know a solution?

Best regards

Martin Fischer
 

deep64blue

DaDaBIK Guru
@Martin68 I can borrow my wife's MAC tomorrow and test it, can you post a screenshot here so I know exactly what I'm looking for please, although I'm pretty sure that's what Eugenio uses.
 

Martin68

Well-known member

Your current DaDaBIK version​

You are using DaDaBIK version 11.8-Elba enterprise, installed on 05.01.2023 (installation code: x), the latest version of DaDaBIK is 11.8-Elba released on 05.12.2022

You are running the latest release of DaDaBIK

System info​

PHP Version: 7.4.3-4ubuntu2.17

mysql version: 5.5.5-10.3.38-MariaDB-0ubuntu0.20.04.1

Web server: Apache/2.4.41 (Ubuntu)

Client: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.2 Safari/605.1.15
 

Sooty57

New member
dadabik.com/dadahelpdesk_demo/index.php?tablename=requests&function=edit&where_field=id_request&where_value=7939

The problem appears to be with select single fields only.

Safari 16.3
 

Attachments

  • Capto_Capture 2023-03-10_12-20-45_pm.png
    Capto_Capture 2023-03-10_12-20-45_pm.png
    172.1 KB · Views: 2

fs_massimo

New member
Same problem, I solved it changing the 'vertical-align:top' style hard coded in views/form.php line 542 to 'vertical-align:text-top' :

542 $form .= "<span style='vertical-align:text-top' id=\"".$field_button_hint_container_id_prefix.$field_name_temp."\">";

It seems to work well with all browsers, may be a better solution could be to add a class selector instead of the hard coded style
 

Martin68

Well-known member
Any idea how to fix "Pages" - the width of the field "menu order" is to small ... that are the numbers 201...

1678614334664.png
 

eugenio

Administrator
Staff member
@Martin68 the form is already veery large and it would be even larger. I would say that having more than 99 pages is something very unusual, isn't it?
 

Martin68

Well-known member
i have been developing the database on the fly, and I reserved blocks for connected tables .. 95 Tables up to now ... would presume to cut width of the "parent item" field ...
 
Top